๐ŸฅŠ Gauntlet review โ€” mdn/beginner-html-site-styled

commit 6c7a360 ยท ran as web ยท 61s ยท ~6k tokens ยท evidence sealed & signed (manifest.json)

19/30โ–ฒ was 18/30
Runs
8/10
Delivers its claims
8/10
Code quality
3/10

The site is a simple static HTML/CSS page (an MDN beginner tutorial fork) that served correctly and matched the README's content claims when driven live. However, the live probe caught a genuine bug โ€” an insecure http:// font stylesheet causing mixed-content blocking โ€” indicating the CSS/HTML wasn't fully hardened for HTTPS delivery. With no source excerpts, tests, or manifest supplied, code quality must be judged mostly on the visible defect and the minimal nature of the deliverable.

Strengths

Concerns

The submission's own tests

No test command found.

Security sweep

audit: n/a ยท secrets: no matches

Failure-mode probe

CheckStatusTrace leaked
GET a route that does not exist404no
POST malformed JSON to /501no

README claims, checked by driving the app

Ask the candidate

  1. The Google Fonts stylesheet link uses http:// instead of https://, causing mixed-content blocking under HTTPS โ€” how would you fix this and why did it happen?
  2. This repo is largely a copy of an MDN starter tutorial โ€” what specific parts of the HTML/CSS did you personally write or modify versus scaffold from the tutorial?
  3. If you were to extend this into a real multi-page site, how would you structure the CSS to avoid duplication and handle responsive layout?

What the cloud browser saw (125ms to DOM)

screenshot
Mobile viewportmobile screenshot

Generated by Gauntlet โ€” sandboxes & cloud browsers by Solari, judgment by Claude. Verify this evidence: npm run verify -- <this directory>